Analysis of traditional utilitarianism

Russell Hardin rejects such arguments. Hedonism then claims that pleasure is the only intrinsic good and that pain is the only intrinsic bad. Rather, he is assuming that the moral point of view is impartial in a way that prudence is not.

The theological utilitarians had the option of grounding their pursuit of happiness in the will of God; the hedonistic utilitarians needed a different defence. Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert, New York: In determining the consequences of actions, Singer argues that we must accord equal consideration to equal interests.

Classical economics received some of its most important statements from utilitarian writers, especially David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill. His principle of equal consideration of interests does not dictate equal treatment of all those with interests, since different interests warrant different treatment.

Then there is a question about how demanding or revisionary utilitarianism actually is. The second claim does not follow from the first. It says that a sanction should be applied iff doing so is optimal. John Stuart Mill Mill was brought up as a Benthamite with the explicit intention that he would Analysis of traditional utilitarianism on the cause of utilitarianism.

There are at least six aspects of Singer's theory that portend great normative uncertainty at any level of application.

He must be either evil or a bungler. How Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism Differ Both act utilitarians and rule utilitarians agree that our overall aim in evaluating actions should be to create the best results possible, but they differ about how to do that.

He suggests that many of the problems arise under the traditional formulation because the conscientious utilitarian ends up having to make up for the failings of others and so contributing more than their fair share. Cases like these lead some consequentialists to deny that moral rightness is any function of the values of particular effects of acts.

If consequentialists can better explain more common moral intuitions, then consequentialism might have more explanatory coherence overall, despite being counterintuitive in some cases.

Eventually, the symposium was cancelled and Singer's invitation consequently withdrawn. Longmans, Green and Dyer, Singer, Animal Liberation, supra note 16, at But conduct of which this can be truly asserted, admits of justification only because it can be shown that on the whole more happiness will exist in the world, if feelings are cultivated which will make people, in certain cases, regardless of happiness.

Consequentialists also might be supported by deductive arguments from abstract moral intuitions. Moore's ideal utilitarianism, for example, takes into account the values of beauty and truth or knowledge in addition to pleasure Moore83—85, ; The second was an end to the tariffs and restrictions that governments imposed on foreign imports to protect domestic producers.


He said, "I think this has made me see how the issues of someone with these kinds of problems are really very difficult". Another indirect version is virtue consequentialism, which holds that whether an act is morally right depends on whether it stems from or expresses a state of character that maximizes good consequences and, hence, is a virtue.

The respect principle is a type of Kantian "transcendental" principle that Kant regarded as unifying moral judgments. That is, we value virtue, freedom, etc. But then it is possible for there to be wrongdoing a suboptimal act that is blameless or even praiseworthy. Instead, it operates like a proper name in that its meaning derives entirely from what it denotes.

This matter of inclusion is to be distinguished from the matter of the scope of any rights that animals may have once we move them from one side to the other.The theory of justice analysis is where philosophy and ethics comes into play to deal with fairness.

John Stuart Mill (1806—1873)

With this paper I will attempt to explain to you what are some of the principles of justice theories how the principles of these theories differ from traditional utilitarianism, how justice is defined by modern criminal justice agencies and.

Aug 21,  · Utilitarianism as an ethics theory primarily values the good of the community over the good of the individual. One might think of it as “the ends justify the means.” In other words, the metric for a good utilitarian action is the degree to which it benefits the community rather than the cost it has to that community.

Utilitarianism can explain why we hold certain types of activities, such as lying, to be immoral: it is so because of the costly effects it has in the long run.

However, traditional utilitarians would deny that an action of a certain kind is always either right or wrong. Term Paper Warehouse has free essays, term papers, and book reports for students on almost every research topic.


John Stuart Mill (—) John Stuart Mill () profoundly influenced the shape of nineteenth century British thought and political discourse. Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism, in normative ethics, a tradition stemming from the late 18th- and 19th-century English philosophers and economists Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill according to which an action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it .

Analysis of traditional utilitarianism
Rated 3/5 based on 9 review